Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 11 results ...

Akunyumu, S, Fugar, F D K, Adinyira, E and Danku, J C (2021) A review of models for assessing readiness of construction organisations to innovate. Construction Innovation, 21(2), 279-99.

Alvanchi, A, Bajalan, Z and Iravani, P (2021) Emission assessment of alternative dam structure types, a novel approach to consider in new dam projects. Construction Innovation, 21(2), 203-17.

Chileshe, N, Kavishe, N and Edwards, D J (2021) Critical factors influencing the bid or no-bid decision of the indigenous small building contractors in Tanzania. Construction Innovation, 21(2), 182-202.

Elhegazy, H, Ebid, A, Mahdi, I, Haggag, S and Abdul-Rashied, I (2021) Implementing QFD in decision making for selecting the optimal structural system for buildings. Construction Innovation, 21(2), 345-60.

Garg, R, Chhikara, R, Singh, R, Agrawal, G, Talwar, V and Mehra, V (2021) A qualitative study to understand the factors affecting the adoption of glass fiber-reinforced gypsum (GFRG) as a sustainable building technology: insights from Indian construction industry. Construction Innovation, 21(2), 321-44.

Li, H, Su, L, L.V, L and Xia, Q (2021) Detecting unbalanced bidding to achieve economic sustainability using fuzzy logic approach. Construction Innovation, 21(2), 164-81.

Marzouk, M and Ashmawy, M M (2021) Assessment of highways concrete and asphalt pavements using superiority inferiority ranking technique. Construction Innovation, 21(2), 259-78.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: asphalt highways; concrete highways; infrastructure; lifecycle cost analysis; multi-criteria decision-making
  • ISBN/ISSN:
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-10-2019-0107
  • Abstract:
    Highways are one of the most critical infrastructure projects with strategic impact on the countries' development. Asphalt has been historically the main pavement material used in all highway projects, especially in Egypt. However, with the booming in concrete technology in the past two decades, concrete has become a strong rival to asphalt, especially in highway applications. Several factors impact the decision-making criteria for any highway, which differ according to the priorities and requirements of each decision-maker and the nature of the project. This research focuses on studying and analyzing the different factors that impact the decision for selecting the material type for highways in Egypt's pavement construction industry. The outputs of the analysis are then incorporated into a multi-decision-making tool to assess the optimum solution as per the priorities of the decision-maker. A holistic framework is developed to compare asphalt and concrete pavements solutions considering; initial cost, maintenance cost on the life cycle, construction duration, embodied energy and fuel consumption. The data collection on local highways was performed through interviewing and surveying experts in the consulting, contracting and building materials fields (total of 15 respondents). A multi-decision-making tool developed using the superiority and inferiority ranking method for selecting the best alternate. To illustrate the practicality of the proposed framework, a case study for assessment and validation has been done on Sokhna–Quarries highway in Egypt. The framework results reveal that despite a lower initial cost and faster construction of asphalt, concrete pavement is more cost-efficient on the lifecycle time. The multi-decision-making model indicates that concrete is a better alternate for highway applications given the cost, time and energy factors considered. The proposed model takes into consideration the important parameters in selecting the type of pavement to be constructed considering two alternates asphalt and concrete.

Ormeño Zender, Y and García de Soto, B (2021) Use of Scrum in the rehabilitation of a commercial building in Peru. Construction Innovation, 21(2), 145-63.

Rodrigues, F, Antunes, F and Matos, R (2021) Safety plugins for risks prevention through design resourcing BIM. Construction Innovation, 21(2), 244-58.

Silverio-Fernández, M A, Renukappa, S and Suresh, S (2021) Strategic framework for implementing smart devices in the construction industry. Construction Innovation, 21(2), 218-43.

Vaz-Serra, P and Edwards, P (2021) Addressing the knowledge management "nightmare” for construction companies. Construction Innovation, 21(2), 300-20.